Benchmarking models predicts downlink throughput in high-density 5G networks, suggesting uncertainty quantification improves accuracy.
Accurate short-horizon downlink throughput prediction is essential for automation in high-density 5G deployments (e.g., stadiums and events), where user load, scheduling decisions, and interference conditions change rapidly and produce highly variable user-perceived rates. This paper benchmarks lightweight regression models for per-user throughput prediction from readily available radio access network (RAN) key performance indicators (KPIs) and studies a risk-aware extension that augments point forecasts with calibrated uncertainty and an abstention (deferral) rule. Experiments use a strictly time-ordered train/calibration/test protocol on the Liverpool 5G High-Density Demand (L5GHDD) dataset. The target is strongly zero-inflated (about 62% of samples at 0 Mbps) and heavy-tailed, creating regimes where average-error optimization can mask rare but operationally important bursts. In the point-prediction benchmark, the best model is a tuned two-stage support vector regressor with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.452 Mbps, while the strongest single-stage model attains a weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE) of 56.200%. For uncertainty quantification, we compare standard split conformal prediction against two input-adaptive alternatives. Constant-width split conformal attains 88.900% marginal coverage for a nominal 90% target with an average interval width of 2.288 Mbps, but width-based deferral is degenerate because all intervals have the same size. Variable-length conformal intervals preserve near-nominal coverage (91.100%) while producing informative width variation: normalized conformal reduces the average width to 1.344 Mbps, and conformalized quantile regression reduces it to 0.641 Mbps. At a deferral threshold of 1.5 Mbps, constant-width conformal defers all samples, whereas normalized conformal still acts on 61.200% of samples with selective MAE 0.219 Mbps. These results show that input-adaptive uncertainty is necessary for meaningful selective prediction in heteroscedastic 5G throughput dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sirhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: