Systematic review explores innovation management and technology adoption in microalgae biotechnology, indicating evolving bioeconomy trends.
This study integrates a Systematic Literature Review (PRISMA 2020) with a bibliometric analysis to examine how global research on microalgae biotechnology has incorporated innovation management, technology transfer, and dynamic capabilities. A total of 418 records were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2015–2025, of which 133 studies met the inclusion criteria after deduplication and screening based on an adapted PICO framework. Bibliometric indicators were generated using Bibliometrix (R) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) to identify publication trends, leading countries, collaboration networks, and thematic structures. The results suggest a progressive shift from predominantly techno-biological research toward approaches that emphasize technology maturity, innovation processes, and organizational capabilities. Three main analytical outcomes were identified: (i) studies addressing dynamic capabilities related to organizational learning and strategic reconfiguration (14.1%); (ii) research focused on technology readiness levels (TRL) and technology adoption, reflecting the transition from laboratory-scale research to pilot and industrial implementation (22.9%); and (iii) analyses of innovation ecosystems highlighting university–industry collaboration, governance mechanisms, and bioeconomy-oriented policies (17.7%). Nevertheless, approximately 22% of the literature remains exclusively technical, indicating a persistent disciplinary bias. By integrating innovation management, technology transfer, and dynamic capabilities as complementary analytical lenses, this review develops a comprehensive framework for understanding how microalgae biotechnology contributes to the consolidation of sustainable bioeconomy-oriented innovation ecosystems. The findings underscore the potential of technology governance and TRL-based management to bridge the gap between scientific research and industrial deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopez-Barrera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: