Proposed framework aims to define AI action legality structurally, influencing global AI governance.
This paper proposes a framework for an International Model Law for Artificial Intelligence Systems (IMLAIS), organized around three legislative domains: embodied AI, language model AI, and domain-specific AI applications. The central claim is architectural: the legality of an AI action should be determined by structural conditions—not by post-hoc rule application. Includes 32 articles with principle, normative, and technical specification levels. Reference implementation: LIN System.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui-Pi Lin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: