PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior1 citations

Governance and leadership for the green transition: institutional decision-making and policy alignment in higher education institutions

View Full Paper
EAEmmanuel Yusuf AttahFaculty of DesignSJSuccess Musa JibrinVeritas University

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how institutional governance and leadership facilitate the green transition in higher education institutions.
  • Qualitatively dominant multi-methods research design across 40 higher education institutions
  • Integration of quantitative analysis of sustainability performance metrics
  • Qualitative thematic analysis of institutional documents
  • Framework based on institutional and transformational leadership theories
  • Sustainability performance is influenced by governance–leadership coherence
  • Transformation stems from the dynamic interaction between governance and leadership
  • Effective governance offers stability and accountability while leadership provides vision and adaptive capacity
  • Regional variations present context-dependent pathways to coherence

Abstract

Purpose This paper investigates the interplay between institutional governance and leadership in enabling the green transition within higher education institutions (HEIs), proposing that their synergy is critical for transformative change. Design/methodology/approach A qualitatively dominant multi-methods research design was adopted across 40 HEIs, integrating quantitative analysis of sustainability performance metrics with qualitative thematic analysis of institutional documents, framed by institutional and transformational leadership theories. Findings The research reveals that sustainability performance is contingent on “governance–leadership coherence.” Effective transformation occurs not from structures or agency alone, but from their dynamic interaction: governance provides stability and accountability, while leadership supplies vision and adaptive capacity. Regional variations highlight context-dependent pathways to this coherence. Originality/value The study makes a significant theoretical contribution by developing and validating an integrated governance–leadership coherence model (GLCS), offering a novel framework to analyse and catalyse systemic institutional change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Attah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8eca04f884e66b53127bhttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-10-2025-0307
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper