Pilot study shows distinct exercise profiles in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, highlighting the value of combined assessments.
Background: In patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, resting structural parameters alone may not explain exertional symptoms. Hence, we investigate whether combined Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing- Exercise Stress Echocardiography (CPET-ESE) can provide an integrated functional characterisation of hypertrophic phenotypes. Methods: As a preliminary investigation, this prospective single-centre pilot study enrols 43 patients, categorised into: obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 19), transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (n = 15), or preserved-ejection-fraction hypertrophic phenotypes (n = 9). Patients undergo symptom-limited semi-supine CPET-ESE on an electronically braked cycle ergometer with an individualised ramp protocol. Peak effort is defined by symptom limitation and respiratory exchange ratio criteria (RER≥1.05), while peak VO2 is defined as the highest 30 s averaged value. Results: Exercise responses differ across phenotypes. Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have higher peak VO2 than the other groups, despite their lower chronotropic reserve. The preserved-ejection-fraction hypertrophic group shows lower peripheral oxygen extraction, whereas transthyretin amyloidosis shows a mixed central and peripheral limitation pattern. Right ventricle–pulmonary artery uncoupling is observed in the latter two groups. Conclusions: The use of CPET-ESE may help describe distinct physiological exercise profiles in hypertrophic phenotypes, but these findings should be considered exploratory. The small, heterogeneous and single-centre cohort precludes definitive mechanistic or predictive conclusions and supports the need for larger validation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scolari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: