PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citations

Characteristic of the infiltration recharge effect in coal mine under reservoirs.

View Full Paper
TLTianwen LongShaanxi Coal Chemical Industry Technology Research InstituteKGKang GuoShaanxi Coal Chemical Industry Technology Research InstituteRSRong ShangShaanxi Coal Chemical Industry Technology Research Institute

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify seepage mechanisms under dynamic loading in coal mines beneath reservoirs.
  • Conducted in situ double-ring infiltration experiments (n = 68)
  • Performed particle gradation analysis
  • Developed a fracture-porosity dual-domain model for assessment of groundwater recharge
  • Vadose zone lithology includes loess and shows extremely low permeability (K = 6.52 × 10⁻⁷-3.47 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s)
  • Infiltration rates range from 0.000029-0.000563 m/d across various lithologies
  • Reservoir seepage loss at the working face measured at 5.9 ± 0.7 m³/d, lower than conventional predictions

Abstract

To address the critical scientific gap in quantifying fracture-dominated seepage mechanisms under reservoir dynamic loading, this study proposes an integrated methodology combining in situ double-ring infiltration experiments (n = 68), particle gradation analysis, and a novel fracture-porosity dual-domain model to assess groundwater recharge and reservoir leakage risks during coal mining beneath the Hongyanhe Reservoir. Key findings reveal: The vadose zone lithology (loess/weathered sandstone/silty clay) exhibits extremely low permeability (K = 6.52 × 10⁻⁷-3.47 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s), providing effective anti-seepage barriers; saturation-driven flow is gravity-dominated, with infiltration rates of 0.000029-0.000563 m/d across lithologies; Reservoir seepage loss at the 4105 working face is 5.9 ± 0.7 m³/d (95% CI), which is lower than conventional model predictions and poses no risk to mine safety; Field observations suggest that fracture density and silt layer thickness are primary controls of seepage variability. This work establishes the first physics-based framework for safe coal extraction under reservoirs, releasing 2.1 million tons of otherwise stranded resources while ensuring reservoir integrity. Results provide a decision-making benchmark for global mining under water bodies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Long et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8ef304f884e66b5314e3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45532-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lithology-Dependent Evolution of Porosity and Permeability in Fault Fracture Zones: Implications for Sustainable Mine Water Hazard Mitigation and Groundwater Resource Protection2026
  2. 2Fracture Expansion and Closure in Overburden: Mechanisms Controlling Dynamic Water Inflow to Underground Reservoirs in Shendong Coalfield2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Control of Water-Conducting Fracture Zone and Phreatic Response in Shallow Coal Seam Groups via Gangue Grouting Backfilling: An Integrated Field Monitoring and Physical Simulation Study2026
  4. 4Floor Damage Evolution in Coal Mine Reservoirs2026
  5. 5Safety assessment and recommendations for water storage in underground reservoirs of steeply inclined coal seams2026