Key result
Sex-specific proteomic scores are linked to ~40-60% higher ischemic stroke risk per SD.
Why the study?
Are there sex differences in proteomic signatures associated with incident ischemic stroke?
Population
52,292 participants from the UK Biobank, including 609 men and 445 women who developed incident ischemic…
Comparison
Measurement of 2,911 proteins using the OLINK… vs Age-matched controls without incident ischemic…
Design
Case-control
Follow-up
Median 8.6 years in men and 9.1 years in women
Authors
Loading...
Proteomic profiling identified sex-specific protein signatures associated with incident ischemic stroke, highlighting potential differences in underlying pathophysiology between men and women.
Case-Control (n=52,292)
Are there sex differences in proteomic signatures associated with incident ischemic stroke?
Effect estimate: OR 1.42 (men), OR 1.58 (women) (95% CI 1.18-1.70 (men), 1.30-1.93 (women))
p-value: p=<0.05
Proteomic profiling identified sex-specific protein signatures associated with incident ischemic stroke, highlighting potential differences in underlying pathophysiology between men and women.
Abijah et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Ischemic Stroke (n=52,292). Sex-specific proteomic scores vs. Lower proteomic score (per 1 SD decrease) was evaluated on Incident ischemic stroke (OR 1.42 (men), OR 1.58 (women), 95% CI 1.18-1.70 (men), 1.30-1.93 (women), p=<0.05). Sex-specific proteomic scores were significantly associated with incident ischemic stroke, yielding odds ratios per 1 SD increase of 1.42 (95% CI 1.18-1.70) in men and 1.58 (95% CI 1.30-1.93) in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: