Experiments demonstrate energy dissipation differences in composite structures under impact loading, suggesting implications for mine safety during seismic events.
The synergistic deformation and energy dissipation of backfill–surrounding rock composite structures under impact loading remain poorly understood, despite the frequent exposure of deep mine backfilled stopes to dynamic disturbances such as blasting and seismicity. In this study, Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) tests were conducted at a fixed impact pressure of 0.2 MPa on single-material specimens and bonded backfill–rock composite cylinders, with loading applied from both the backfill end and the surrounding rock end. Single backfill specimens exhibited dominant reflected energy (~90%) and low crushing energy consumption (<20%), whereas composite specimens displayed characteristic “double-peak” or “flat-peak” stress–strain signatures with peak strengths exceeding that of standalone backfill. When loading was directed from the high-strength surrounding rock into the backfill, the reflected energy ratio decreased to 60–80% and crushing energy consumption increased to 20–30%, demonstrating a loading-direction-dependent energy dissipation mechanism. These results provide a quantitative reference for optimizing blast sequence design in backfilled stopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: