Simulation evaluates cost-guided alternatives for fire containment in a California unit, suggesting improved resource use.
Prescribed fires can reduce hazardous fuel loads, but planning remains challenging in landscapes with complex terrain, mixed vegetation, and nearby infrastructure. Predicting and controlling where a prescribed fire may breach its containment lines can be carried out by integrating fire-behavior simulations with practical treatment planning. This paper presents a two-stage framework using QUIC-Fire to identify high-risk escape zones and allocate containment treatments under cost and resource constraints. Stage 1 identifies high-risk boundary segments and assigns adjacent zones to fuel removal or moisture treatment to limit simulated fire spread beyond the control line. Stage 2 refines these assignments by incorporating treatment costs and penalty values near infrastructure to evaluate resource-constrained alternatives. Applied to a 14.2-ha prescribed-fire unit in Mount Laguna, California, the optimized Stage 2 configuration maintained containment under the simulated conditions while reducing total implementation cost from USD 97,319 to USD 95,266 (approximately 2.1%) and reducing fire-engine demand from six to three. These results illustrate how cost-aware treatment reallocation can improve resource efficiency for prescribed-fire performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: