Key result
Nutrition-enhanced community health worker intervention proves feasible but fails to improve blood pressure or diet.
Why the study?
Does a nutrition-enhanced community health worker intervention improve feasibility, acceptability, and blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
No
Does a nutrition-enhanced community health worker intervention improve feasibility, acceptability, and blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
A nutrition-enhanced community health worker intervention for hypertension management was feasible and acceptable but did not significantly improve blood pressure or diet quality compared to a basic program over 4 months.
Background: Diet modification is an AHA/ACC Class 1 recommendation for hypertension management. Few clinical dietary interventions for hypertension exist, particularly in low-income settings. Community health workers (CHWs) could fill this gap. This pilot trial assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a nutrition-enhanced CHW intervention embedded within an existing hypertension management program. Methods: Health center patients who enrolled in a CHW hypertension (Basic) program at a Boston, MA health system were eligible for this randomized pilot study if they were ≥21 years old and spoke English or Spanish. The Basic program included home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, hypertension education, and CHW communication with PCP about uncontrolled BP. Participants were randomized to the Basic program (Control) or the nutrition-enhanced Basic program, which included 4 modules on label reading, simplified nutrition guidance (e.g., traffic light categories, green=healthy), healthy eating on a budget, and meal planning, and accompanying worksheets/activities. Participants were followed for 4 months. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 4 months; BP measures were obtained from the electronic health record. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes, assessed with mixed models, compared intervention vs. control groups in 4-month changes in BP, diet quality (rapid Prime Diet Quality Score), and nutrition knowledge (General Nutrition Knowledge). Results: Of 108 adults potentially eligible, 60 (56%) enrolled in the study. Study participants were mostly female (66%) and Hispanic (68%) and had mean age of 57.7 (sd=12.6) years. At baseline, 90% were taking BP medications daily, and 38% had food insecurity. In the intervention group (N=31), 74% completed ≥3 of 4 nutrition modules, 81% completed ≥3 of 6 worksheets/activities, and 100% completed the home food/cooking assessment. All intervention components were acceptable (rated ≥7.5 of 10 points). At follow-up, systolic and diastolic BP decreased, and diet quality and nutrition knowledge increased in both groups; however, there were no between-group differences (Table). Conclusion: A CHW nutrition education and support intervention within a hypertension management program was feasible and acceptable but did not demonstrate short-term differences in diet or health. A larger trial with longer follow-up is needed to assess intervention effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in hypertension (n=60). nutrition-enhanced CHW intervention vs. Basic CHW hypertension program was evaluated on feasibility and acceptability. A nutrition-enhanced community health worker intervention for hypertension was feasible and acceptable (components rated ≥7.5 of 10) but showed no between-group differences in BP or diet at 4 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: