Testing assessed peak load capacity and displacements in adobe walls, suggesting fiber type impacts structural behavior.
This study tested quarter-scale adobe masonry walls under monotonic in-plane loading, considering the effect of water content at the foundation–wall interface, fiber type, and openings (i.e., door, window). Seven walls were constructed with unstabilized adobe bricks containing either cut straw or sisal fibers and mud mortar. Gravimetric water content (wb) at the foundation–wall interface (i.e., wall base) varied by test wall, ranging from 2.4 to 4.9% by dry mass. The walls were instrumented to measure in-plane and out-of-plane displacements and vertical deflections during the load tests. Greater water contents at and near the wall base shifted cracking toward the lower courses and along the foundation–wall interface; however, the peak load capacity did not vary significantly with wb but was strongly influenced by crack trajectory, including whether cracking diverted into the foundation or propagated rapidly along the foundation–wall interface. Peak loads ranged from 1928 N (433 lb) to 6517 N (1465 lb). Fiber type influenced deformation behavior of the walls, with sisal-brick walls generally developing larger vertical deflections and, in some instances, larger peak in-plane displacements than straw-brick walls. Window and door openings altered crack initiation and propagation by concentrating cracking at opening corners and producing segmented mechanisms, increasing in-plane displacements in some cases, but still sustaining comparatively large peak loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dávila et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: