Randomised trial demonstrates improved recovery and reduced pain scores in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery using opioid-free anaesthesia.
Introduction: Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA), when incorporated into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, may improve peri-operative safety and recovery in patients with obesity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a multimodal OFA regimen incorporating loco-regional anaesthesia in this population undergoing general anaesthesia. Patients and Methods: In this prospective randomised study with participant and outcome-assessor blinding, 380 adults (body mass index >35 kg/m 2 ) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to receive OFA or non-OFA (N-OFA). The OFA group received dexmedetomidine (0.3–0.5 μg/kg/h), low-dose ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) and an ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The N-OFA group received fentanyl (1–2 μg/kg ideal body weight). All patients received total intravenous anaesthesia. The primary outcome was time to discharge readiness (DR). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid requirement, quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) and airway-related adverse events (ARAEs). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, and pain scores were significantly lower in the OFA group at 3 and 24 h ( P < 0.001). At 24 h, 61.1% of patients in the OFA group reported no pain compared with 42.6% in the N-OFA group. Rescue opioid requirement was markedly reduced (2.1% vs. 95.5%, P < 0.001). Time to DR was shorter (9.7 ± 1.6 h vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 h, P < 0.001), and QoR-40 scores were higher in the OFA group. ARAEs were not statistically significant. Conclusion: OFA using loco-regional block, dexmedetomidine and ketamine improves recovery, reduces opioid use and accelerates DR in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: