This article examines evolving perspectives on decolonization in history education, indicating a critical role in shaping collective memory in Indonesia and the Netherlands.
History textbooks wield significant influence in shaping collective memory and identity, which is why history education is often positioned as both culprit and cure for gaps in collective memory. Yet its own historical development often remains underexamined. This article addresses this gap by examining how perspectives on decolonization have evolved in Indonesian and Dutch history education from 1950 to 2025, underscoring the need to empirically ground and historicize these perspectives across diverse temporal and spatial contexts. Employing a diachronic and transnational framework that engages with geopolitics and processes of instrumental and cultural perpetuation, it discusses history education as both a contested site and a catalyst for critical reflection and reparative action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlies et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: