Analysis shows disparities in cervical cancer mortality persist in Black and White populations, suggesting more targeted prevention strategies are needed.
INTRODUCTION: While advances in cervical cancer prevention and early detection have reduced mortality rates in the United States, racial disparities persist. This study examines county-level temporal trends in cervical cancer mortality in Black and White populations. METHODS: Age-adjusted cervical cancer mortality rates in the 50 most populous U.S. counties were obtained from the SEER database across six 8-year intervals from 1969 to 2022 (T1: 1969–1977 to T6: 2014–2022). Counties with more than one interval of missing data were excluded. Trends were assessed using weighted linear regression. RESULTS: Of 49 counties with available data, 41 showed declines in all-race mortality rates ( P <.05). Mortality rates declined linearly in 31 of 34 counties for Black individuals ( P <.05; T1: mean, per 100,000 people, 7.88 [SE 0.15] to T6: 1.64 [0.04]) and in 33 of 49 counties for White individuals ( P <.05; T1: 2.76 [0.03] to T6: 1.04 [0.01]). Average Black-to-White mortality rate ratio across counties was 2.96 in T1 (significant in 27 of 31 counties) and 1.67 in T6 (significant in 21 of 42 counties; P <.05). The ratio in T6 ranged from 0.87 to 4.36, with highest values in Hennepin, Minnesota (4.36); Nassau, New York (3.24); St. Louis County, Missouri (2.89); New York, New York (2.60); Fulton, Georgia (2.54); and Cook, Illinois (2.26). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Although disparities in cervical cancer mortality have narrowed, mortality has not equalized, and there is geographic variability. These findings highlight the importance of local-level assessment to identify targeted interventions across the cervical cancer screening and early detection continuum, especially in the current context of rapidly evolving prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: