Descriptive study reveals ICU nurses' concerns about family involvement and emotional benefits in patient care, indicating a need for policy reform.
Background Family‐centred visiting (FCV) has become an integral element of humane and holistic intensive care in many Western settings. However, its adoption in Chinese ICUs remains limited, and the perspectives of nurses, who are central to implementing visiting policies, are underexplored. Aim To explore ICU nurses' attitudes and perceptions towards FCV and identify impact factors influencing its potential implementation in China. Study Design This study employed a descriptive qualitative design. Twenty ICU nurses were recruited through purposive sampling from a tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, China. Semi‐structured, face‐to‐face interviews were conducted between March and June 2024. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven‐step method. The reporting followed COREQ guidelines. Results Three overarching themes were identified: (1) balancing compassion and capacity, (2) the Family presence as a double‐edged sword for patient care and (3) institutional and cultural constraints on family involvement. While nurses acknowledged FCV's emotional benefits, they expressed concern about increased workload, infection risk and blurred professional boundaries. Their attitudes were strongly shaped by hierarchical institutional norms and Confucian values, which both encourage filial duty and reinforce deference to medical authority. Conclusions ICU nurses' ambivalence towards FCV reflects a complex interplay of professional, institutional and cultural factors. Culturally sensitive training, policy reform and pilot programmes could support the gradual implementation of flexible visiting practices. Relevance to Clinical Practice Findings highlight the need for context‐adapted FCV models that balance humanised care with safety and capacity, empowering nurses as key facilitators of family engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: