Experiment shows differentiation occurs in hemispheric specialization in vertebrates, suggesting factors like fitness landscape influence outcomes.
Hemispheric specialization is a widespread feature of vertebrate nervous systems, but the minimal conditions under which bilateral systems differentiate, acquire polarity, and retain asymmetric states remain unclear. Here, we examined these issues using a minimal evolutionary model with two initially equivalent processing channels. Each channel evolved a spatial integration width while receiving the same input, and fitness rewarded the magnitude of a bilateral mismatch-separation signal rather than explicit anomaly localization. Under exact developmental symmetry, 40 lineages evolved robust left–right differences in integration width without significant directional fixation (median |Δa| = 2.511; 22 right-wider, 18 left-wider). Weak developmental gain asymmetry biased polarity selection in a graded manner, shifting outcomes toward right-wider or left-wider solutions depending on bias direction. Forced-symmetry, shared-parameter, and single-channel controls showed that high performance depended on allowing differentiated bilateral processing. After biased solutions were reseeded under restored symmetry, differentiation was retained and amplified (median |Δa| > 6.6), consistent with history-dependent persistence within the sampled fitness landscape. Structured backgrounds increased differentiation magnitude but imposed greater decision-time costs. These results distinguish differentiation, polarity bias, and persistence as separable components of minimal hemispheric specialization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: