This review proposes frameworks for OSCC screening programs, highlighting governance structures and equity approaches for better outcomes.
Purpose: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) carries a substantial burden in low- and middle-income countries as well as underserved subpopulations within high-income settings, where structural barriers contribute to worse outcomes. While evidence supports targeted screening of high-risk groups, practical guidance for designing organized, quality-assured programs remains limited. This review proposes a framework to translate contemporary cancer-screening principles into operational criteria for OSCC. Methods: A review following the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles principles was conducted. Conceptual papers, international evaluations, implementation studies, and programmatic guidance were included. The evidence was synthesized narratively, with emphasis on contemporary cancer-screening principles, implementation frameworks, and their applicability to OSCC. Results: Clinical oral examination can improve the detection of OSCC in early stages and reduce mortality among high-risk groups when embedded in coordinated care pathways. Effective programs require governance structures, screening policies, risk-stratified approaches, and robust information systems capable of call-recall, referral tracking, and quality monitoring. Dental schools and academic clinics may serve as feasible regional hubs for programs within mixed health systems. Conclusions: Aligning core OSCC-screening principles with operational enablers offers a practical pathway to develop context-appropriate programs that strengthen capacity, promote equity, and generate evidence for responsible scale-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos-Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: