PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Sustainable Development0 citationsOpen Access

Expansion of the Brazilian Sugarcane Bioenergy System Promotes Greenhouse Emission Reductions and Sustainable Development Without Compromising Food Security

View Full Paper
AGAngelo C. GurgelSASofia M. ArantesLBLuciane C. Bachion

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effects of expanding the Brazilian sugarcane bioenergy system on economy and food security.
  • Used two independent economy-wide models to assess impacts.
  • Analyzed effects on economic growth, social outcomes, and food security scenarios.
  • Considered future climate mitigation scenarios.
  • Increased sugarcane ethanol production by 37% positively impacts food security.
  • Projected 6% increase in food consumption by 2030.
  • Estimated 2% to 3.5% rise in GDP per capita by 2030.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The growing global demand for biofuels has raised concern about compromising food security. This study uses two independent economy‐wide models to evaluate the impact of expanding the Brazilian sugarcane bioenergy system on economic growth, social outcomes and food security. Our analysis finds that increasing Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production by 37% over the 2024/2025 harvest has slightly positive impacts on food security, with marginal but variable effects on prices and household consumption across regions, depending on the model assumptions and analyzed scenario. Under future climate mitigation scenarios, expanding the sugarcane bioenergy system would result in a 6% increase in food consumption and between 2% and 3.5% rise in Brazil's gross domestic product per capita by 2030. These outcomes stem from the properties of the sugarcane ethanol industry, including its high energy yield, low carbon footprint, contribution to labor and income generation, and role in agricultural intensification. Our results demonstrate the importance of considering comprehensive economic linkages when evaluating bioenergy impacts, including income‐side effects, thereby moving beyond isolated price‐based analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gurgel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b532530https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper