PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures0 citations

A Physics‐Informed Neural Network for High‐Accuracy Multiaxial‐Fatigue Life Prediction of Aluminum Alloys With Mechanical Interpretation

View Full Paper
YCYong‐gui ChenXSXin‐hao ShuZFZheng-Wei Fan

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the accuracy of multiaxial fatigue life predictions for aluminum alloys using a neural network.
  • Developed a physics-informed neural network for fatigue life prediction.
  • Integrated CNN-LSTM architecture for extracting spatial–temporal features from loading paths.
  • Employed multi-head attention to merge features with material properties.
  • Embedded physical laws into the loss function for consistency.
  • Achieved R² = 0.873 for predictions, with 97.3% accuracy within a 3 times error band.
  • Reduced model parameters significantly compared to purely data-driven models.
  • Identified peak shear stresses and tensile strength as critical factors in fatigue life predictions.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate prediction of multiaxial fatigue life is crucial for structural integrity. This study proposes a physics‐informed neural network for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of aluminum alloys, addressing the limitations of purely data‐driven methods in capturing loading path characteristics, while ensuring physical consistency. The model integrates a parallel CNN‐LSTM architecture to extract spatial–temporal features from loading paths, while a multi‐head attention mechanism fuses these with material properties. The physical laws (higher tensile and yield strengths enhance fatigue life) are embedded via loss function. Compared with other purely data‐driven models, the proposed model achieves superior generalization ( R 2 = 0.873, with 97.3% of predictions within 3 times error band on the life prediction) and significant reduction in model parameters. Furthermore, SHAP and Grad‐CAM provide interpretability by quantifying feature contributions and visualizing critical path regions. Analysis reveals peak shear stresses and rapid stress change rates dominate predictions, and tensile strength is the most critical factor among material properties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b53261chttps://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70297
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of crack initiation location and its influencing factors of fretting fatigue in aluminum alloy components2021 · 12 citations
  2. 2Fatigue limit prediction of 7050 aluminium alloy based on experimental and shallow + deep hybrid neural network2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3A multiaxial fatigue criterion for various metallic materials under proportional and nonproportional loading2005 · 93 citations
  4. 4Fatigue property prediction of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using probabilistic physics-guided learning2021 · 87 citations
  5. 5A novel bidirectional LSTM network model for very high cycle random fatigue performance of CFRP composite thin plates2024 · 23 citations