Multiaxial fatigue damage remains a critical barrier to the reliable design of metallic engineering components, particularly under complex non-proportional loading paths. Conventional critical-plane and energy-based models rely heavily on empirical assumptions and struggle to capture intricate path-dependent damage evolution, leading to limited accuracy and generalizability. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel data-driven framework that integrates heterogeneous information sources through a three-branch parallel neural architecture. Specifically, a deep neural network (DNN) extracts static material intrinsic properties; a bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) enhanced with a multi-head self-attention mechanism captures long-term temporal dependencies and adaptively weights key stages in loading histories; and a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) extracts local strain fluctuation patterns. The three streams are fused to produce a comprehensive damage representation for end-to-end life prediction. The output of the model is the base −10 logarithm of fatigue life, i.e., lg(Nf). Evaluated on a public multiaxial fatigue dataset comprising 40 metals and 1167 samples, the proposed model achieves a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9052, achieving promising performance on a fixed data split (R2 = 0.9052); ablation studies demonstrate the complementary nature of the three feature extraction branches, though 5-fold cross-validation suggests that the performance gain requires further validation with larger datasets. Systematic ablation studies confirm that the multi-source fusion strategy and the attention mechanism are pivotal to the performance gain. This work offers a robust and effective data-driven solution for high-accuracy fatigue life assessment, and points toward future integration of physical knowledge to further enhance extrapolation and transparency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: