This review demonstrates how biomarkers improve diagnosis and therapy in breast cancer, suggesting new approaches to clinical trials.
The advent of breast cancer molecular subtyping has transformed management, enabling treatment personalisation and de-escalation beyond traditional stage-based approaches. Established biomarkers, such as Ki-67 in luminal disease, HER2 amplification, and PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer, underpin seminal clinical trials yet remain imperfect predictors of response and long-term outcome. MicroRNAs have emerged as promising next-generation biomarkers and therapeutic tools. As master regulators of gene expression, both tumour-derived and circulating microRNAs can refine diagnosis and molecular subclassification, inform prognosis and therapeutic selection, act as treatment sensitisers, and potentially serve as direct therapeutic targets. Well-characterised miRNAs such as miR-221 have been implicated in endocrine resistance, while recent liquid-biopsy approaches have enabled the identification of circulating miR-145 and exosomal miR-155 as predictors of pathological complete response in HER2-positive disease. Their detectability in tissue, blood and other biofluids offers a minimally invasive means to dynamically monitor cancer behaviour and response, supporting more precise therapeutic decision-making. This review synthesises the current evidence for miRNA-based biomarkers across oestrogen-receptor positive, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer and outlines their potential integration into biomarker-driven clinical trial designs and personalised treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkabaah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: