Systematic review shows no significant TMJ alterations after MARPE in adults, suggesting its safe use as an orthopedic procedure.
Objectives: Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) is increasingly used for adult transverse maxillary deficiency. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify three-dimensional changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space and condylar position following MARPE. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted through May 2025. Inclusion criteria followed the PICOS framework: human participants (≥12 years) undergoing MARPE with pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography assessments. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROBINS-I) were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Four studies comprising 95 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in condylar joint spaces: Anterior [SMD = −0.04 (95% CI: −0.35 to 0.26; P = 0.81; I 2 = 0%)], posterior [SMD = 0.31 (95% CI: −0.01 to 0.61; P = 0.06; I 2 = 0%)], and superior [SMD = 0.23 (95% CI: −0.05–0.42; P = 0.12; I 2 = 0%]. Narrative synthesis indicated transient clockwise mandibular rotation that largely relapsed during retention. The certainty of evidence was rated low-to-moderate due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that MARPE does not induce clinically or statistically significant alterations in TMJ morphology or condylar position in the short term. MARPE appears to be a safe orthopedic procedure for the TMJ, although long-term studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these adaptive trends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: