Strategic zone design improves efficiency and equity in bus-based delivery systems, highlighting trade-offs in urban logistics.
This paper investigates the strategic zone design problem for a bus-based passenger–parcel sharing delivery system. In the envisioned system, parcels are first transported along an existing bus line and transshipped at bus stops, after which dedicated vehicles perform last-mile deliveries from bus stops to customers. By leveraging the underutilized capacity of existing bus services to support parcel distribution, the system contributes to a more resource-efficient and less truck-dependent urban logistics structure, thereby supporting sustainability in urban transportation. The problem is to partition the corridor-level service area into multiple contiguous service zones along the corridor under an m-nearest feasibility requirement. A nonlinear integer programming model is developed that jointly captures parcel and passenger perspectives. On the parcel side, the objective combines zone compactness, parcel-demand balance, and parcel-delivery-distance balance; on the passenger side, it minimizes passenger impact. In this way, the model balances logistics efficiency with social-equity and service-quality considerations and operationalizes sustainability through measurable planning indicators embedded in the objective function. A tailored adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm is proposed to exploit the specific problem structure and solve the model. Case studies based on a real-world bus line in Yancheng, China, illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and yield managerial insights into the choice of the number of zones, the influence of passenger-flow patterns, and the role of objective-function weights in shaping trade-offs between parcel delivery efficiency and equity, as well as passenger service quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: