Status: v0.2 canonical at uha commit 839ce60. Deposit-ready. GATE:OPEN given by Eric 2026-05-04 17:42 UTC. This deposit pre-registers Track B of the three-track UHA + EB carrier program: the cross-survey Ωm baseline common-baseline audit. Track B asks whether different cosmological surveys use different Ωm derivation chains and baselines, whether those differences create systematic effects appearing as cosmological tensions, and whether applying a unified UHA-derived Ωm baseline reduces those tensions across surveys. Z3 is not a Hubble-tension solution paper. It is a pre-registered cross-survey common-baseline audit. Its success condition is not "H0 solved" — it is "a locked Ωm substitution reduces joint tension under identical likelihoods, without extra degrees of freedom, and robustly across local-calibrator routes." Z3 does not directly challenge the SH0ES distance-ladder calibration. It tests whether cross-survey Ωm baseline substitution changes the joint-inference tension after the local-ladder H0 measurement is held fixed as a public-data constraint. Hypotheses (Track B): H0-Z3: Surveys use Ωm baselines that agree within statistical uncertainty (|ΔΩ_m| < 0.005). Substituting a unified UHA-derived Ωm baseline produces no significant Δχ² improvement (Δχ² ≤ 5 per Z0 §1.4). H1-Z3: Surveys use Ωm baselines that differ systematically (|ΔΩ_m| ≥ 0.005). Substituting a unified UHA-derived Ωm baseline produces Δχ² ≥ 20 improvement under identical likelihoods and no degree-of-freedom inflation. Termination criteria K0-Z3 … K4-Z3 lock five preregistered halt conditions (KS aliases deprecated). A K-firing is a successful preregistered outcome — the test ran and falsified its mechanism cleanly. A clean null is a co-equal publishable outcome per Z0 §9. v0.2 delta from v0.1 (2026-05-01): Δχ² thresholds normalized to Z0 5/20/49 hierarchy throughout; KS labels deprecated and aliased to canonical K0-Z3 … K4-Z3; venue-prestige routing removed; κ pre-Phase-3 lock procedure inserted; cross-protocol cascade narrowed (Z3 null halts Track B only, not all UHA coordinate-provenance tests); EB three-outcome primitive table added; local-anchor and distance-ladder route stratification added (Cepheid / TRGB / JAGB, Madore-style); Pantheon+ SN-transfer separation added; "common-baseline audit" language used in decision rules; Bayes-factor narrowing (BF>3) for Track B adjudication; explicit non-challenge of SH0ES distance ladder; clean-null = valid publishable outcome surfaced. Full changelog in §11 of the manuscript. Public-data scope: SH0ES R22, Planck 2018, KiDS-1000, DES Y3, DESI DR1, Pantheon+. Dataset versions, release dates, and access dates recorded at analysis start. Provenance: Source protocol: Omega_M_Baseline_Unification_Experiment_Complete_v1.0_77b639c.md (commit 77b639c; patent gates removed 2026-05-01) Companion protocol: UHA_Coordinate_Framework_Experiment_Complete_v1.0_77b639c.md Z0 umbrella: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19881689 (deposited 2026-04-29) Z2 audit framework: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19908184 (deposited 2026-04-29) EB carrier theorem: RSOS-260797 r4 (under review) UHA patent: US 63/902,536 Bootstrap commit: 839ce60 in github.com/abba-01/uha This Z3 deposits the Ωm-baseline-unification hypothesis as one candidate explanation for cross-survey cosmological tensions. Other candidates remain open and are listed in §5.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric D. Martin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: