This study investigates the safety limitations of autonomous vehicles operating under dense fog conditions, where sensor performance is severely degraded, and explores the potential of cooperative control for collision avoidance. A comparative framework is developed using the CARLA simulator to analyze four driving configurations: no perception and no communication, degraded LiDAR–radar sensing, V2V-assisted Model Predictive Control (MPC), and V2V-assisted MPC enhanced with predictive buffering. The methodology integrates fog-dependent perception modeling, cooperative hazard messaging, and real-time MPC-based longitudinal control, and evaluates system performance through multiple simulation trials under urban and highway conditions. Key performance indicators include time-to-collision, reaction time, maximum deceleration, jerk, and collision occurrence. The results demonstrate that perception-only strategies lead to late reactions and unsafe emergency braking, with minimum TTC values as low as 0.29 s and frequent collision events. In contrast, V2V-assisted MPC significantly improves anticipation and driving comfort, while the proposed predictive buffering approach achieves a 0% collision rate and increases the minimum TTC to approximately 1.93 s. The inclusion of predictive buffering further enhances robustness against communication losses, enabling smoother deceleration and consistently safe inter-vehicle spacing. Overall, the findings confirm that cooperative V2V communication combined with predictive control effectively compensates for fog-induced perception degradation and represents a viable solution for improving safety and reliability in low-visibility autonomous driving scenarios.
Yanboiy et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: