Numerical model predicts velocity and temperature in magnetohydrodynamic fluid flows through porous media, indicating nonlinear thermal effects matter.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of nonlinear thermal radiation, Darcy–Forchheimer dissipation and Joule heating on the flow of a power-law conducting fluid over a stretching porous wedge embedded in a Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium. The study also aims to develop and validate a deep learning framework based on the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm to accurately predict velocity and temperature distributions in complex nonlinear transport phenomena. Design/methodology/approach The governing nonlinear partial differential equations are transformed into nonlinear ordinary differential equations using a second-order local non-similarity approach. The resulting boundary value problem is solved numerically using MATLAB’s bvp4c solver. A deep learning model using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, gradient descent optimization and a hyperbolic tangent sigmoid activation function is used to predict velocity and temperature profiles. Findings The deep learning predictions show excellent agreement with numerical solutions, with absolute errors of order 10−4–10−5 and very low mean squared errors. Increasing radiation and temperature ratio parameters significantly modifies the thermal boundary layer, causing non-monotonic temperature behavior near the wedge surface. Darcy dissipation reduces fluid temperature, while Forchheimer dissipation increases it. Originality/value This study combines nonlinear thermal radiation and Darcy–Forchheimer effects within a second-order local non-similarity framework, alongside a Levenberg–Marquardt-based deep learning model. The hybrid approach delivers highly accurate predictions for complex porous media flows, demonstrating the power of deep learning beyond traditional numerical methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haq et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: