In complex marine environments, achieving low-cost, highly reliable, and continuous navigation is crucial for the intelligent and autonomous operation of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). Currently, the integrated Global Navigation Satellite System and Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (GNSS/SINS) serves as the primary navigation architecture for USVs. While the cost of high-performance GNSS receivers has steadily decreased, high-precision SINS remains prohibitively expensive. Consequently, micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based SINS has emerged as a preferred alternative due to its favorable balance of cost, power consumption, and size. However, significant inertial sensor errors make it difficult to maintain high-precision positioning during GNSS outages. To address this limitation, the single-axis rotational inertial navigation system (SRINS) has been introduced. Nevertheless, constrained by the single-axis mechanical structure and complex sea state disturbances, the system still struggles to effectively modulate random errors and azimuth gyroscope drift, rendering it insufficient for highly demanding navigation tasks. To overcome these bottlenecks, this article systematically reviews four core technologies: (1) Comprehensive denoising and temperature drift compensation techniques for MEMS gyroscopes; (2) rapid moving-base initial alignment models under high sea state disturbances; (3) fast online calibration methods for azimuth gyroscope drift; and (4) adaptive and robust GNSS/SINS integration architectures capable of accommodating high-dynamic conditions and non-Gaussian interference. Finally, this article discusses the engineering conflict between deploying high-precision algorithms and the limited onboard computational capacity of USVs. It concludes by highlighting a highly promising navigation paradigm for future research: the integration of factor graph optimization with physics-informed deep learning.
Su et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: