Do the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index predict adverse outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
The combination of hsTnT and sPESI effectively risk-stratifies normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism, identifying low-risk patients who may be candidates for out-of-hospital treatment.
BACKGROUND: The new, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) assay may improve risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We externally validated the prognostic value of hsTnT, and of the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI), in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively examined 526 normotensive patients with acute PE; of those, 31 (5.9%) had an adverse 30-day outcome. The predefined hsTnT cutoff value of 14 pg/mL was associated with a high prognostic sensitivity and negative predictive value, comparable to those of the sPESI. Both hsTnT ≥14 pg/mL (OR, 4.97 95% CI, 1.71-14.43; P=0.003) and sPESI ≥1 point(s) (OR, 9.51 2.24-40.29; P=0.002) emerged, besides renal insufficiency (OR, 2.97 1.42-6.22; P=0.004), as predictors of early death or complications; in a multivariable model, they remained independent predictors of outcome (P=0.044 and 0.012, respectively). A total of 127 patients (24.1%) were identified as low risk by a sPESI of 0 and hsTnT <14 pg/mL; none of them had an adverse 30-day outcome. During 6-month follow-up, 52 patients (9.9%) died. Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated that patients with hsTnT ≥14 pg/mL (P=0.001) and those with sPESI ≥1 (P<0.001) had a decreased probability of 6-month survival. Patients with sPESI of 0 and hsTnT <14 pg/mL at baseline had a 42% reduction in the risk of dying (hazard ratio, 0.58 0.01-0.42; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The hsTnT assay and the sPESI improve risk stratification of acute PE. Combination of both modalities may yield additive prognostic information and particularly identify possible candidates for out-of-hospital treatment.
Lankeit et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: