Randomized trial employs AI for predicting match outcomes in integrated plastic surgery applicants, indicating significant application characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread consensus that quantifiable application characteristics impact match success, no prospective predictive algorithm has been created in any specialty since the implementation of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring. The rise of artificial intelligence presents a novel method to analyze application factors to predict success in the ever-competitive integrated plastic surgery match. DESIGN: Quantifiable data from Plastic Surgery Common Applications (PSCAs) submitted to a single academic center in the 2023 to 2024 and 2024 to 2025 match cycles were collected. About 70% of applications from the 2023 to 2024 cycle were utilized to train a random-forest classification model to predict match status. This model was subsequently evaluated using the remaining 30% of 2023 to 2024 applicants and prospectively validated with applicants from the 2024 to 2025 match cycle. SETTING: University of Kansas Medical Center, tertiary center. PARTICIPANTS: About 713 integrated plastic surgery applicants in the 2023 to 2024 and 2024 to 2025 match cycles. RESULTS: The single most important predictor of match rate in our model was graduation from a highly ranked medical school, followed by average recommendation letter strength and USMLE Step 2 score. The predictive model demonstrated strong performance in classifying matched and unmatched cases in the 2023 to 2024 data with an AUROC of 0.85 and a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (95% CI 73.7%-89.6%, p < 0.0001). Prospective validation yielded consistent results, with an AUROC of 0.84 and a balanced accuracy of 77.6% (95% CI 73.1-81.7, p < 0.0001), validating the longitudinal accuracy of this model. The final model was deployed within our newly designed Match Prediction App, allowing real-time probability estimation of match outcomes based on selected input features. CONCLUSIONS: This model provides a comprehensive analysis of integrated plastic surgery residency match predictors, aiding both applicants and program directors in understanding key factors that influence match outcomes. While academic metrics like Step 2 scores are critical, the significance of letters of recommendation highlights that holistic review remains essential for residency selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godbe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: