Randomized trial compares irrigant activation methods for postoperative pain in patients with irreversible pulpitis, suggesting ultrasonic activation may be more effective.
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of irrigation activation techniques on postoperative pain (PP) in mandibular premolar teeth after single-visit endodontic treatment. Methodology: Eighty patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were selected. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups based on the final irrigation methods – Group I (side-vented needle), Group II (sonic activation), Group III (ultrasonic activation), and Group IV (reciprocal activation). After final irrigation protocol, obturation was done with gutta-percha points and AH Plus root canal sealer in a cold lateral condensation technique in all the groups. Postendodontic restoration was done using nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z350 × t, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA). Evaluation of PP was done at specific time intervals (2, 6, 24, 48, 72 h, and 7 days) after the single-visit root canal treatment. Patients were also instructed to take analgesics (ibuprofen 200 mg) if their pain scale crosses score 2 postoperatively based on Wong–Baker Faces chart. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically analyzed by Friedman test and Mann–Whitney U -test. Results: There was a statistical significant difference in the mean PP scores among all the groups at different time intervals ( P < 0.05). Group III resulted in significantly less PP and analgesic than all the other groups in the first 24 h. Conclusion: Ultrasonic activation (Group III) showed least PP and analgesics intake than all the other groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaiswal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: