Key result
ChatGPT correctly identifies only ~43% of cardiac diagnostic hypotheses compared to physician records.
Why the study?
Does ChatGPT accurately diagnose and recommend management for patients with cardiovascular conditions compared to physicians?
Observational
No
Does ChatGPT accurately diagnose and recommend management for patients with cardiovascular conditions compared to physicians?
ChatGPT demonstrated low accuracy in diagnosing (43%) and recommending tests (5-10%) for cardiovascular patients, indicating it is not yet reliable for clinical decision-making.
INTRODUCTION: ChatGPT is a cost-effective artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed to facilitate virtual interactions with humans, and its application in healthcare is expanding. However, research on ChatGPT's effectiveness in public healthcare, particularly for cardiac patients, is still limited. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's potential in managing cardiovascular health for patients with acute or chronic cardiac conditions. METHODS: We analyzed real medical records from 'The Cardiovascular Care' program, affiliated with a university outpatient clinic. ChatGPT's performance was evaluated in terms of its ability to analyze clinical cases, propose diagnoses, and recommend appropriate actions. We also assessed whether ChatGPT's accuracy and errors varied depending on disease severity, rarity, mortality risk, and urgency. RESULTS: When compared to physicians' records, ChatGPT provided correct responses in 43% of diagnostic hypotheses, 5% of recommended supplementary exams, and 10% of laboratory tests. It showed significant accuracy and discernment in diagnosing conditions influenced by factors such as severity, rarity, risk of death, and urgency. However, this discernment did not extend to recommendations for supplementary exams and laboratory tests. Interestingly, while ChatGPT's responses in these areas were often only partially accurate, they tended to be more detailed, sometimes unnecessarily so, than those provided by physicians. Diagnostic hypotheses from multiple models, including ChatGPT Health, DeepSeek, Gemini Pro, Perplexity AI, and ESC Chat, were also evaluated. Performance varied across models, with ChatGPT demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy among those assessed, despite still producing incorrect outputs. CONCLUSION: Although ChatGPT demonstrates some diagnostic capability, its overall reliability remains questionable, with performance at times approaching random chance. Caution is advised when considering its use in clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mialarett et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute or chronic cardiac conditions. ChatGPT vs. Physicians' records was evaluated on Correct responses in diagnostic hypotheses. ChatGPT correctly identified 43% of diagnostic hypotheses, 5% of supplementary exams, and 10% of laboratory tests compared to physician records for patients with cardiac conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: