Quantitative analysis shows dosimeter performance varies by position, suggesting adjustments can improve accuracy.
The light an individual is exposed to, or personal light exposure (PLE), plays an important role in human health and well-being research. PLE is typically quantified using body-worn light dosimeters (sensors), but their effectiveness as a proxy for measuring at the eye remains insufficiently understood. By combining 3D body scans and lighting simulations, we quantified the discrepancies between chest-worn and eye-level dosimeter measurements under three generalized indoor lighting scenarios. Chest-worn dosimeter performance was found to be highly context-dependent, with the smallest deviations (between −26.2% and 63.8%) observed for devices on the lower chest. Quantifying corneal light exposure, i.e., considering the field of view of the human eye, based on chest-worn dosimeter measurements proved problematic as deviations under overhead lighting exceeded a minimum 25%. To deepen our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, we disaggregated the causes of these discrepancies into three factors: the translational dosimeter displacement, the rotational dosimeter displacement, and body self-occlusion. The results indicate that minimizing the rotational displacement is key to reducing measurement discrepancies and inter-individual variability. To improve the validity of chest-worn dosimetry, an individualized approach is recommended: selecting a chest position where the dosimeter best aligns with the subject’s typical view direction during expected activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vries et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: