Preclinical study compares injectable oligomeric collagen and hyaluronic acid fillers in rats, revealing better volume persistence and reduced inflammation.
Introduction: Dermal fillers are widely used to restore facial volume, yet current materials often exhibit swelling, inflammatory responses, or limited persistence. Objective: To compare rheological and extrusion properties, volumetric persistence, and local tissue response of an injectable, in-situ scaffold-forming oligomeric collagen with a commercially available hyaluronic acid filler and saline in a rat model. Methods: Oligomeric collagen was administered by subcutaneous injection, with commercial filler and saline as controls. Animals were evaluated at 1, 6, and 12 weeks using three-dimensional volumetric scanning and histopathological analyses. Rheological, compressive, and extrusion properties were measured. Statistical comparisons used one-way analysis of variance or Student’s t -tests. Results: In this 12-week rat study, oligomer demonstrated low extrusion force and stable scaffold volumes after equilibration. Extrusion force was similar to saline and ∼15-fold lower than the commercial filler. Scaffold volumes were ∼25% of the injected volume and remained stable from 1 to 12 weeks. The commercial filler exhibited swelling (∼400%) at 1 week, followed by ∼83% volume loss. Histological analysis showed minimal inflammatory response with scaffold integration, whereas the commercial filler exhibited regional inflammation and fibrous capsule formation. Conclusions: Injectable scaffold-forming oligomer exhibited low extrusion force, persistent volume, and minimal local tissue response over 12 weeks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: