Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining continuous glucose monitoring and urinary C-peptide improves insulin sensitivity evaluation in adults, suggesting non-invasive alternatives may be viable.
AIM: Assessing insulin sensitivity is a central component of clinical research in metabolism. Although considered the gold standard, the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp evaluates insulin sensitivity under non-physiological conditions and is highly burdensome and costly, thereby prompting the development of alternative methods. The 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion rate adjusted for energy intake is a surrogate marker of insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic adults. We hypothesized that the combination of 24-h continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion (24 h-glycemia/C-peptide ratio) would be a better predictor of insulin sensitivity than the C-peptide excretion rate adjusted for energy intake or other widely accepted indexes. METHODS: (high-dose)]. RESULTS: ranging from 0.108 to 0.174 for the clamp high dose. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the 24 h-glycemia/C-peptide ratio is a promising simple, inexpensive, non-invasive, and physiological marker of insulin sensitivity that deserves further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez‐Delgado et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: