This analysis shows BAC rejection and zeta potential shifts in membranes during nanofiltration, suggesting impacts on micropollutant removal.
Cationic surfactants from quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) are increasingly recognized as relevant micropollutants particularly following their widespread use during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The new EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (2024/3019) highlights micropollutant removal as a regulatory priority, mandating advanced treatment for their elimination. In this context, this study examined benzalkonium chloride (BAC) retention and membrane response during nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), across concentrations ranging from monomeric to micellar. RO membranes achieved >97% rejection, whereas NF showed 65–96% removal strongly affected by micelle formation. Flux decline was most pronounced in RO, with relative permeability (J/J0) decreasing to ~0.12 at 1.0 CMC, while NF membranes exhibited better hydraulic stability. Membrane active layer zeta potential measurements confirmed adsorption and charge neutralization, with shifts toward less negative values after BAC exposure. Hermia model analysis revealed that fouling was governed by cake layer formation or pore blocking, depending on membrane type and feed concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klimonda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: