Observations reveal sea–land breeze influences surface currents in Taiwan Strait, suggesting strong monsoon conditions drive variations.
High-Frequency (HF) radar remote sensing offers a unique capability to detect mesoscale air-sea interactions under strong monsoon conditions. This study leveraged HF radar-derived surface currents, buoy observations, and reanalysis data to systematically investigate the driving mechanism of the sea–land breeze (SLB) on surface currents in the Taiwan Strait during the strong winter monsoon. To address the challenge of extracting weak signals from a dominant background flow, we employed the Separation of the Regional Wind Field (SRWF) method and the complex demodulation spectrum shifting technique. The results demonstrate that HF radar observations confirm the presence of regular SLB activity even under the strong monsoon, with its intensity modulated by the land–sea temperature difference influenced by cloud cover. Spatial correlation analysis reveals that the SLB significantly drives diurnal variations in the surface current, with its impact extending up to 110 km offshore and a maximum amplitude of approximately 2.2 cm/s. Additionally, the analysis reveals that the duration of SLB events critically influences the current response: events lasting 7 days produce a stronger and more spatially coherent correlation with the diurnal currents than shorter 5-day events. Furthermore, harmonic analysis indicates that the SLB’s energy primarily affects the non-tidal residual current, with no significant impact on the principal diurnal tidal constituents (O1, K1). This work not only quantifies the SLB-current coupling during sustained SLB events in a strong monsoon regime but, more importantly, demonstrates the capability of HF radar remote sensing for resolving weak signals in complex, high-energy environments, providing a robust methodological framework and valuable insights for regional marine environmental forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: