Experimental analysis shows that moisture content affects maize kernel breakage modes, implying improved energy efficiency in processing.
Mechanical damage to maize kernels during harvesting, transportation, and processing reduces quality and increases postharvest losses. However, the coupled effects of moisture content, kernel size, and kernel shape on breakage behavior remain insufficiently quantified, which limits damage control and process optimization. In this study, quasi-static compression tests were conducted on 3000 kernels of cultivar MY73 to identify breakage modes and to evaluate the influences of moisture content, equivalent diameter, and shape. The results indicate that maize kernel breakage occurs primarily in three modes. Bursting exhibits the highest breakage strength and energy demand, followed by split fracture and edge breakage. Moisture content is the dominant factor governing compressive failure; increasing moisture markedly reduces breakage resistance and progressively weakens the effects of size and shape. Across the classified combinations of moisture content, size, and shape, breakage probability is well described by a Weibull distribution, and the fitted parameters enable mode-specific probability prediction under arbitrary loading conditions. These findings clarify multi-factor-coupled breakage behavior of maize kernels and provide a Weibull-based probabilistic approach for predicting breakage modes, offering a methodological reference for rapid screening of crack-resistant maize varieties and for optimizing equipment and process parameters in harvesting and postharvest operations to reduce mechanical damage and improve energy efficiency in grain processing. • Identify three distinct maize kernel breakage modes with clearly different strength and energy signatures. • Reveal coupled effects of moisture, size, and shape on strength, with moisture as dominant driver. • Develop a Weibull-based model to predict kernel breakage probability under varied loading conditions. • Although strengths across breakage modes are similar, maize kernel mass-normalized energies differ significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: