In vitro agonism of synthetic cannabinoids on the 5-HT 2A receptor induces hypothermia and neurological effects in mice, suggesting psychiatric risks.
Background and Purpose New synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are associated with severe adverse effects, including unexpected psychiatric symptoms. These compounds are mainly active through their potent agonism on the cannabinoid receptors CB 1 and CB 2 . Recently, evidence of the direct interaction of some SCRAs with the serotonergic 5‐HT receptors has emerged. Experimental Approach SCRAs were screened for in vitro 5‐HT 2A receptor activity using AequoScreen® intracellular Ca 2+ release and inositol monophosphate (IP 1 ) formation assays. The pharmaco‐toxicological effects induced by the administration of the most effective compound in vitro (AB‐5′F‐BUTINACA) were investigated in male CD‐1 mice with specific focus on its interaction with CB 1 and 5‐HT 2A receptors. Key Results Many SCRAs with a valinamide (AB) or tert ‐leucinamide (ADB) head moiety had in vitro activity at the 5‐HT 2A receptor at high concentrations with AB‐5′F‐BUTINACA and ADB‐BUTINACA amongst the most efficacious. In vivo studies showed that AB‐5′F‐BUTINACA caused neurological changes, sensorimotor alteration, antinociception, hypothermia, reduction in breath rate and hypolocomotion in mice. The neurological, sensorimotor, and thermal antinociceptive effects were mediated by CB 1 and 5‐HT 2A receptors, as they were prevented by pretreatment with the selective CB 1 and 5‐HT 2A receptor antagonists (NESS0327 and MDL100907, respectively). Conclusion and Implications This study demonstrated for the first time that SCRAs with a valinamide or tert ‐leucinamide head moiety activate the 5‐HT 2A receptor. Agonism of the compound AB‐5′F‐BUTINACA at the 5‐HT 2A receptors resulted in in vivo effects. Our data revealed potential risks related to SCRA consumption that could exacerbate unexpected psychiatric conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: