This framework supports documenting and analyzing observations in literary criticism, suggesting enhanced methodologies for data management.
In the scope of the Digital Humanities, it is useful to represent and reason about data that make explicit observations (claims) on the subjects being studied. This is particularly interesting in criticism, where scholars debate different topics, sometimes grounding their claims on what others have said, some other times rejecting and even contradicting them. In this paper we present an ontology, in the form of a Semantic Web model, to support the documentation, analysis, and management of observational data. Our ontology focuses on literary criticism, although its design follows a modular architecture, enabling its use in other application contexts. We discuss throughout the paper the motivations for our research, as well as its potential and limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanfilippo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: