A systematic literature review highlights dynamic partial reconfiguration in FPGA floorplanning, suggesting a transition to AI-driven approaches.
Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration (DPR) has emerged as a key enabler of runtime adaptability and hardware-software co-design in modern FPGA-based heterogeneous systems. However, with the transition toward 5nm technologies and multi-die 3D-IC architectures, spatial resource management faces a “complexity wall,” where traditional manual floorplanning techniques struggle to satisfy timing, utilization, and scalability constraints. This study presents a systematic literature review and proposes a comprehensive taxonomy of FPGA floorplanning and placement methodologies developed over the past two decades. The proposed classification organizes existing approaches into three generations: 1) the Heuristic Era, focused on rule-based automation and physical feasibility; 2) the Optimization Era, characterized by formal mathematical models and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) for heterogeneous resource allocation; and 3) the Autonomous Era, which leverages AI-driven techniques, including Reinforcement Learning and intelligent scheduling, to enable predictive and shape-adaptive placement strategies. This evolution reflects a fundamental shift from static grid-based management toward elastic, self-optimizing FPGA fabrics. We further examine emerging architectural constraints, including Super Logic Region (SLR) boundaries and hierarchical nested Partial Reconfigurable Regions (PRRs). Beyond this taxonomy, the survey identifies a critical scalability–optimality trade-off, highlighting the need for hybrid frameworks that combine the formal guarantees of optimization-based methods with the real-time adaptability of AI-driven approaches. It further establishes a unifying perspective in which DPR is evolving from a logic-reconfiguration mechanism into a thermal–spatial management paradigm for mitigating heat in high-density 3D-IC systems. Finally, the analysis reveals a significant functional–physical gap in current autonomous design tools, emphasizing the need for context-aware agents capable of jointly reasoning about temporal task dependencies and spatial floorplanning constraints. This review provides a structured roadmap for the development of next-generation intelligent control frameworks for edge and cloud-scale reconfigurable computing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LIMEM et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: