This study presents a comparative evaluation of three modern surveying techniques—UAV photogrammetry, static tripod-based LiDAR scanning, and handheld mobile LiDAR—applied in the context of historic monument restoration. The focus is on analysing workflow efficiency, data accuracy, and adaptability to complex architectural features, including interior wall paintings, which are integral to the monument’s heritage value. Particular attention is given to how each technique captures surface texture, color fidelity, and material deterioration. The study also examines performance around intricate architectural elements such as vaulted ceilings, apses, cornices, columns, and carved stone portals, where occlusions, tight clearances, and fine ornamentation challenge coverage and resolution. By evaluating the strengths and limitations of each approach, the research highlights methodological considerations relevant for conservation professionals. The results indicate that the Static TLS is the most demanding workflow, requiring complex total station integration for control and station points. It produced the highest data density, with acquisition rates of one million points per second, making it the most hardware-intensive and difficult to manipulate. UAV photogrammetry provided a balanced middle-ground; it required minimal physical effort during acquisition and produced datasets that were significantly easier to manage. Handheld SLAM LiDAR emerged as the most productive solution for rapid coverage. While the handheld scanner’s image quality was lower than the photogrammetry, it still provided enough detail for the structural assessment and documentation needed. Although the point cloud lacked the extreme geometric detail provided by the TLS, the FARO Connect software made georeferencing and data manipulation significantly more efficient.
CRISTIAN et al. (Fri,) studied this question.