Explainable machine learning reveals gender differences in seating efficiency and behavior patterns in study spaces.
Seat selection in learning spaces intuitively reflects user preferences for micro-environments and facilities. To address the lack of integrated analysis of multi-dimensional factors in existing research, this study constructs a framework merging multi-source dynamic sensing with explainable machine learning (XGBoost/SHAP/GAM) to decode the non-linear environment–behavior mechanisms underlying seat selection in study rooms. A multi-source dataset was constructed using YOLOv8 for non-intrusive extraction of seat occupancy and user attributes (gender and learning efficiency), combined with Ladybug-based luminous–thermal simulations and spatial topological measurements. The results indicate that: (1) key environmental variables exhibit distinct comfort thresholds, with an optimal illuminance of 400–600 lx and an effective attraction radius for power sockets of 1.5–3.0 m; (2) high-efficiency learners are highly sensitive to path interference, exhibiting a prominent “defensive” seat selection strategy; (3) significant divergences exist between genders regarding spatial depth preferences; and (4) compensatory and synergistic effects exist among multi-dimensional factors, where peak occupancy or superior lighting enhances user tolerance for the absence of sockets. This study quantifies the non-linear interactions between micro-physical environments and spatial behavior, providing a direct data-driven basis for refined facility deployment, dynamic luminous–thermal interventions, and scientific dynamic–static zoning in future learning spaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: