Evaluation shows nitrogen balance improves in maize cultivated after soybean with the Adapt-N model, suggesting effective fertilizer use.
Several nitrogen rate recommendation methods have been developed to help farmers fertilize close to the economic optimum N rate (EONR). The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate a dynamic method (Adapt‐N) for N rate recommendations for maize ( Zea mays L.) in Brazil relative to EONRs determined specifically for each trial and (ii) compare the estimated maize yield, N balance, and profit using the N rate recommendation methods. Seventy‐five N response trials were performed at 14 sites with maize cultivation from different regions in Brazil, most without tillage following soybean ( Glycine max (L) Merrill). On average, the N rate recommendation was higher for Adapt‐N compared with EONR and Official (137, 121, and 115 kg ha −1 , respectively). Average maize yields were similar for EONR (8816 kg ha −1 ), Adapt‐N (8789 kg ha −1 ), and Official methods (8668 kg ha −1 ). The mean profit was around $1400 ha −1 for the methods with no difference. The N average balance (N applied − N removed) was higher in Adapt‐N than for other methods, resulting in positive values in most sites (84%), avoiding soil fertility depletion, whereas EONR and Official methods showed a negative balance in 50%. Overall, Adapt‐N was nearly as good as the EONR calculated for each trial using the actual achieved yield, but with slightly more N applied. Further studies should investigate Adapt‐N when legumes are cultivated as no‐till cover crops in tropical conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: