UAV multispectral imagery identifies growth stress in chestnut trees, suggesting improved monitoring in smart agriculture.
This study aimed to detect growth stress at the individual-tree level in chestnut (Castanea crenata Sieb. et Zucc.) plantations using UAV-based RGB orthomosaic and multispectral imagery and to determine an optimal NDVI threshold for stress classification. UAV surveys were conducted over a 21 ha chestnut orchard located in Gongju, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea. NDVI was calculated and analyzed at the individual-tree level using multispectral imagery. Based on field observations, 100 healthy trees and 23 stressed trees were selected for statistical analysis. The mean NDVI value was 0.900 ± 0.012 for healthy trees and 0.816 ± 0.013 for stressed trees, showing a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed excellent classification performance with an AUC of 1.00. The optimal NDVI threshold determined using Youden’s index was 0.855. Independent validation in another chestnut plantation approximately 1 km away achieved high classification accuracy using the same threshold. These results indicate that UAV-based multispectral imagery combined with NDVI analysis provides an effective approach for early detection of growth stress and precision monitoring at the individual-tree level in chestnut plantations. This study provides a practical and efficient approach for the early detection of growth stress at the individual-tree level, enabling early intervention against potential declines in tree vitality and proactive management in chestnut orchards. The proposed NDVI threshold-based method offers a simple yet robust tool that can be readily applied in precision forestry and smart agriculture to support large-scale monitoring and informed management decisions for maintaining orchard productivity, enabling cost-effective early intervention at the individual-tree level, which is difficult to achieve using conventional ground-based surveys in complex mountainous orchards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: