Cross-sectional survey reveals low health literacy in adults, suggesting education and cultural background influence outcomes.
Introduction Health literacy is known to be deficient in diverse populations. This study aims to evaluate the health literacy of a segment of Australia’s adult population following the COVID-19 pandemic.Method Using quantitative cross-sectional method utilising validated survey guided by STROBE checklist, we used student-led process convenience-based sampling technique for a segment of Australia’s adult population. We collected Sociodemographic and other health literacy questions using a validated HLS-EU-Q16 questionnaire.Results Among 758 participants, almost one-third (220) had low level of HLS-EU-Q16 scores. Results from multiple linear regression model, after adjusting for covariates, indicate that HLS-EU-Q16 scores are significantly higher among participants with regular GP visits (β = 2.01, 95% CI 0.65–3.36), good or excellent self-rated health (β = 1.85, 95% CI 0.52–3.18), education above secondary level (β = 2.21, 95% CI 0.98–3.43), and employment in healthcare (β = 2.70, 95% CI 0.75–4.64). Lower health literacy scores are observed among participants born outside Australia/New Zealand (β = −1.66, 95% CI −3.07 to −0.26).Conclusion The reported health literacy level and the proportion of participants not having a regular GP are concerning. For meaningful gains to be made, demographics such as country of birth and cultural background requires targeted approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: