Analysis reveals that age and treatment types significantly impact survival outcomes in malignant cardiac tumors, indicating tailored interventions are crucial.
Aim: This study aims to evaluate how demographic and treatment variables, including age, tumor type, resectability, and metastasis, affect survival outcomes across prognostic subgroups of primary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCTs). Methods: PMCT cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2021 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries. 730 patients were analyzed and categorized into prognosis groups based on 5-year survival (< 50%, 50–95%, > 95%). Demographic, histologic, and treatment varieties were examined using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 730 patients, most were middle-aged (56.6%), male (52.5%), and White (60.1%). Soft tissue sarcomas predominated in the poorest-prognosis group (80.3%), while hematologic malignancies were most common in intermediate prognosis (52.0%). Younger age significantly reduced mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.49–0.52; p < 0.01]. Brain and lung metastases increased mortality (HR 2.04 and 1.89; p < 0.05). Surgical resection improved survival in sarcoma-dominant tumors, while systemic metastasis predicted poorer outcomes in hematologic malignancies. Chemotherapy improved survival in sarcomas (ρ = 0.457; p < 0.0001) but was associated with poorer outcomes in hematologic cancers (ρ = −0.337; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: PMCT prognosis is primarily influenced by histologic subtype and resectability. Sarcoma-dominant tumors benefit from aggressive surgical and chemotherapeutic management, conversely systemic control is key for hematologic malignancies. Younger age and absence of metastasis consistently predict better outcomes. Histology-specific and early intervention strategies are critical to improving survival in this rare malignancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: