PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention0 citationsOpen Access

Examining the Role of the Social Vulnerability Index in the Association Between Race/Ethnicity with Breast Cancer Outcomes

View Full Paper
XLXinke April LuSHSydney P. HowardLMLauren E. McCullough

Key Points

  • This research examines how the Social Vulnerability Index mediates the relationship between race/ethnicity and breast cancer outcomes.
  • Retrospective analysis of 739,448 breast cancer patients from SEER 18 registries (2000-2016)
  • Mediation analysis of five SVI themes among NH Black, NH API, Hispanic, and NH White patients
  • Quantified percent mediated for understanding impact on late-stage diagnosis and mortality.
  • Socioeconomic status mediated 12.9% of late-stage diagnosis disparities in NH Black patients
  • Household composition explained 18.5% of mortality differences in API patients
  • Overall vulnerability mediated 31.4% of mortality risk among Hispanic women compared to NH White women.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic and environmental inequities may increase vulnerability to breast cancer (BC) among racial and ethnic groups. We examined whether the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) mediates associations between race/ethnicity and BC outcomes, including late-stage diagnosis and BC-specific mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 739,448 BC patients from the SEER 18 registries (2000-2016). Mediation analysis evaluated five 2010 SVI themes-socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status/language, housing/transportation, and overall SVI-in associations between race/ethnicity and BC outcomes among non-Hispanic (NH) Black, NH Asian/Pacific Islander (API), and Hispanic women compared with NH White patients. Percent mediated quantified the proportion of total effects explained by indirect pathways. RESULTS: Among NH Black patients, socioeconomic and overall vulnerability mediated 12.9% and 9.5% of disparities in late-stage diagnosis and mortality, respectively. For API patients, household composition and minority status/language explained 18.5% and 14.7% of mortality differences, with no significant mediation for late-stage diagnosis. Among Hispanic patients, overall vulnerability mediated 9.1% of the disparity in late-stage diagnosis. For BC mortality, socioeconomic, household composition, and overall SVI themes mediated 31.4%, 17.3%, and 30.4% of the 13% higher mortality risk among Hispanic women compared with NH White women. Across NH Black, Hispanic, and Asian women, higher minority status/language vulnerability was associated with ~13% lower BC mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Social vulnerability components partially mediated racial and ethnic disparities in BC stage and mortality. IMPACT: Distinct SVI domains influenced outcomes differently across groups, highlighting the need for structurally focused interventions to improve equity in BC outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3b23https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-25-1088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cancer Mortality in the United States by Education Level and Race2007 · 472 citations
  2. 2Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis and Cancer-Specific Survival by Race and Ethnicity in the United States2015 · 621 citations
  3. 3The Impact of Limited Language Proficiency in Screening for Breast Cancer2022 · 17 citations
  4. 4Current Gaps in Breast Cancer Screening Among Asian and Asian American Women in the United States2021 · 26 citations
  5. 5Housing Insecurity Among Patients With Cancer2022 · 67 citations