Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative case study fosters dialogue on AI ethics and issues, highlighting engagement through storytelling and brainstorming.
Discriminatory algorithms, unauthorized data use, and environmental costs show how artificial intelligence (AI) advancements are tied to larger sociopolitical issues. Through the design and pilot study of AI Dilemmas , an issue‐based traveling exhibition, this qualitative case study explores fostering dialogue on such complex scientific concepts. The findings offer a conceptual design framework to intentionally design for dialogue. Through the pilot study, we observed continuous, on‐topic engagement and dialogue among visitors, who shared personal AI experiences, prior knowledge, and opinions. The dialogues took various forms such as discussions, debate, question‐and‐answer, storytelling, and brainstorming, fostering a rich exchange of ideas and perspectives among visitors. The conclusions speak to the importance of intentional design through an issue‐based approach to foster dialogue about contemporary socioscientific issues, such as AI ethics and biases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heeg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: