Theoretical-field study highlights tribal dynamics affecting elections in Al-Anbar, suggesting they shape social identity and political behavior.
The study aims to highlight the political impact of tribal dynamics on political life in Iraq, with a focus on Al-Anbar Governorate as a significant case study.This focus stems from the fact that tribal affiliation is the dominant force shaping social identity in that governorate. The study makes a deliberate distinction between tribal affiliation as a form of social identity, and tribalism as a driving force that influences political and social behavior.The study is divided into two main parts:Theoretical – tracing the historical development of tribal influence and its political dimensions since the establishment of the Iraqi state in 1921.Field-based – examining a survey conducted by the researchers on a random sample of voters during the local provincial council elections in Al-Anbar.The study concludes that the tribal factor plays a fundamental role in elections—surpassing even political programs and affiliations. As a result, political entities in the governorate are keen to ensure tribal representation among their candidates, particularly by including influential tribal figures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed Mohammad (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: