This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction: As urbanization progresses and vulnerable populations increase, equitable accessibility remains a critical issue. This study evaluates the accessibility of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Shanghai, focusing on barrier-free facilities in metro stations. Methods: A comprehensive evaluation framework combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the System Usability Scale (SUS) was developed to assess metro station accessibility. Thirteen evaluation factors formed a composite accessibility index. A case study of two Shanghai metro stations, Xinzhuang and Xujiahui, was conducted using quantitative metrics, surveys, and interviews. Results: A strong correlation between AHP scores and SUS ratings validated the framework's reliability. The study provides recommendations for enhancing metro accessibility. Discussion: The proposed framework offers a robust tool for evaluating and improving urban transit accessibility, with implications for inclusive mobility policy and design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: